House of Worth Ball Gown Silk Faille 1872 Costume Institute Metropolitan Museum of Art

Fashions of the early on 1870s were ofttimes reminiscent of vesture a century before considering of the United states centennial in 1776; the sides of this overskirt may take been tied upward in a nod to a skirt style of the 1770s. It was a mode that tied the skirt up at two points in the back, oftentimes called a 'polonaise' but more correctly referred to every bit 'retroussée' (Fig. 6). Caroline Goldthorpe summarizes some of the changes of manner in the 1870s. In From Queen to Empress (1988) she writes:

"A costume without an overskirt was virtually the exception later on 1870. The overskirt could be split, worn with a short bodice, or information technology could be part of an elongated jacket bodice; both styles were worn with an underskirt of corresponding or contrasting color. Ane version of this was the polonaise; described at the time equally "in the Pompadour manner," it was intended to be a revival of the mode of the 1770s, with the overskirt hitched up and secured by buttons at the back." (46)

In their 1965 book The History of American Style, E. Warwick, H. C. Pitz and A. Wyckoff draw this manner:

"…a very stylish version of a sacque of about 1770. The overskirt has the lower forepart corners pulled upwardly underneath the fullness of the skirt in a fashion which was described as "rétroussé." (179)

This retro element is visible at the sides of Pingat's 1872 gown, in keeping with the fashion of these years.

The sheer diversity of extensive trimmings on this gown were the meridian of fashion; dresses of this early bustle era were often confections of shaped trims, fringe, lace, and anything else the designer could remember of (Fig. 7). Goldthorpe farther notes:

"Trimmings were lavishly applied to the dress of the 1870s, and gave information technology much of its class and character. Dresses that had a single skirt either simulated the lines of the overskirt in the trimming or divided the skirt into two halves, the front bundled similar an apron in a series of flounces, while a serial of unlike flounces were created at the dorsum." (46)

Skirts often employed horizontal trimming and flounces, often in contrasting fabrics or textures (Fig. 8). Pingat did not cease at pleats, gathers, and bows, but as well ordered contrasting bias, linings, embroidered buttons, and decorative metal parts (Fig. 3). Fine details and finishings were important to dresses in this period; fine material alone was no longer plenty, and dresses made all in one fabric had to work even harder to stay fashionable (Fig. 9). The contrasting color of the overskirt and underskirt was popular, and more restrained than many examples (Fig. 10), every bit Lydia Edwards mentions inHow to Read a Dress (2017):

"This dress sports a cohesive colour scheme, unlike many fashionable ensembles of the time that attempted to meld besides many shades in one garment. Contrasting fabrics were likewise considered fashionable, and this clothes is an example of that with 2 tones of taffeta and silk faille." (101)

Broad cuffs were also trendy, according to the "New York Fashions" column in an issue of Harper'southward Bazar from August 10, 1872:

"Fashionable under-sleeves of linen, to vesture with the standing English language collar, take wide flaring cuffs. These expand toward the wrist, and are fastened on the outside by ii or three large flat linen buttons. As dress sleeves fifty-fifty of the plainest glaze shape are rounded, large, and open about the lower part of the arm, the custom of wearing linen cuffs pinned in is no longer practicable, and an under-sleeve is necessary." (523)

The Pingat gown sports exactly these sleeves, and another glaze-sleeve shape can be seen in figure eleven. These were shaped sleeves that were made slightly loose, and in the 1860s when they start emerged they were narrow enough at the bottom that detachable cuffs could exist used for cleanliness. The coat-sleeves on solar day dresses of the early 1870s were cut wider, and many afternoon and dinner gowns dispensed with the terminal few inches of the sleeve entirely.

Other retro elements of 18th century dress also came dorsum into fashion at this time. Engageantes – long, lacy cuffs – were used on gowns that had three-quarter length sleeves, and lent their ruffled, embroidered nature to even the shorter cuffs like those on the Pingat gown (Fig. v).  Designers also brought embroidered covered buttons back into utilize, and Pingat used them on this gown and others (Figs. 12 & 13). Embroidered buttons were a feature of menswear and court suits in the 18th century, and a logical side by side stride in a period where menswear-inspired touches were get-go to influence women's ensembles (Fig. 14)

Fig. 6 - Designer unknown (Scottish). Apparel (robe à fifty'anglaise retroussée), 1775-lxxx. Silk with boning and lined with linen. London: The Victoria & Albert Museum, T.96&A-1972. Given by Miss A. Maishman. Source: VAM

Fig. 7 - Designer unknown (probably French). Dress, 1865-70 (probably 1871-73). Silk. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, C.I.65.23a, b. Gift of Mrs. William K. Haupt, 1965. Source: MMA

Fig. eight - Mme. Depret (French). Dress, 1867-71. Silk. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, C.I.62.35.2a, b. Gift of Miss Elizabeth R. Hooker, 1962. Source: MMA

Fig. 9 - Illman Brothers (engravers) (American). Les Modes Parisiennes (Peterson's Magazine), May 1872. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, b17509853. Gift of Leo Van Witsen. Source: Watsononline

Fig. 10 - Claude Monet (French, 1840-1926). Camille Monet (1847–1879) on a Garden Bench, 1873. Oil on canvas; 60.vi x 80.3 cm (23 7/viii x 31 5/8 in). New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2002.62.1. The Walter H. and Leonore Annenberg Collection. Source: MMA

Fig. 11 - Designer unknown (English). Dress, 1871-1873. Cotton and silk; length 170.2cm, shoulder to waist: 33cm, hem: 368.3cm, waist: 58.4cm. Manchester: Manchester Art Gallery, 1947.3753. Source: Mag

hoodshabligne.blogspot.com

Source: https://fashionhistory.fitnyc.edu/1872-emile-pingat-visiting-dress/

Share this post